CSPA News
Opening moves in Striper trial favor DFG and CSPA
by Jerry Neuburger
July 17, 2008. The opening salvos were fired in the Coalition
for a Sustainable Delta vs. the California Department of Fish
and Game and the California Fish and Game Commission on Monday,
in the Fresno federal district court. The presiding judge, Judge
Wanger, accepted CSPA's petition to intervene in the case on
behalf of the NCCFFF and the California Striped Bass
Association. The intervener status allows CSPA's attorney, Mike
Jackson, to "intervene" to defend the Department of
Fish and Game and the California Fish and Game Commission. In
addition to CSPA, the firm of Nomellini, Grilli and McDaniel,
have also been accepted as interveners.
The arguments of whether the striped bass is one of the many
delta species that is victim to excessive pumping and delta
water quality degradation or a voracious predator, responsible
for the demise of vast numbers of Chinook salmon and Delta Smelt
did not get to the floor. Instead, as soon as court convened,
DFG's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the
Coalition for a Sustainable Delta had no valid standing and
therefore could not file a suit in federal court. The argument
was strong enough that Judge Wanger, took the motion under
submission, adjourning the court so that he could give the
motion adequate consideration before ruling.
Prior to leaving courtroom the judge asked some brief
questions regarding the Central Valley Project Improvement Act
passed by the U. S. Congress in 1992. (Public Law 102-575 ) One
of Congress's mandates to the state of California was to double
delta fishery populations within ten years of the law's
enactment. Unfortunately, the judge gave no hint as to why he
raised the issue.
While DFG has been unsuccessful in increasing fisheries
populations, the question still needs to be asked, how does DFG
get sued for following or attempting to follow the direction of
the Congress of the United States? If the judge finds that the
Coalition does have standing or allows them to modify their
complaint to give them standing, the issue of Congress's mandate
will probably become much more than a quick comment before the
courtroom clears.
Court will convene again in September.